Our methodology is qualitative and interpretive, as befits an initial exploratory study of a research area. Our intention is to make sense of the ways that reclaimed materials are used in early childhood settings. We want to gain some understanding of the beliefs and attitudes of practitioners in relation to the uses of these materials in their settings.
This qualitative, interpretive methodology fits with the
ecological, contextualist theories that underpin our research. We recognise
that knowledge in the social world is created and recreated between people. Our
sources of knowledge about reclaimed materials are the actions and voices of practitioners,
and children, within their workplaces - accessed and developed through our interactions
with them. We are aware, like Anne Edwards, that contexts shape and are shaped
by those who participate in them[i].
We are beginning to explore the systems theory that those researching and
writing about education for sustainability draw upon.
Overall, our motivation
for undertaking the study is to appreciate uses of reclaimed materials - as a
first step towards researching and promoting education for sustainability
within early childhood education.
This collective case study approach is chosen here in order to include different types of early years setting, from varying geographical areas, and so reflect something of the diversity of early childhood provision. The four settings within this study are not separate cases but rather each informs the shared, collective case to maximise what can be learned about uses and understandings of reclaimed resources.
[i] Edwards,
A. (2004) Understanding context, understanding practice in early education.
European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 12 (1) 85 – 101.
No comments:
Post a Comment